Bishops condemn insurance mandate
Jan 31
2012
In Roman Catholic churches across the country this past weekend, priests read statements from their local bishops urging the faithful to fast, pray, protest and take action against a new health-care mandate issued by the federal government.
The Jan. 20 ruling by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will require virtually all employers, including Catholic hospitals and educational institutions, to provide health insurance that includes surgical sterilization and prescriptive contraceptives without charging employees a co-pay or a deductible.
That would be in direct conflict with Catholic doctrine, which has consistently condemned all forms of contraception except natural methods. The nation's Catholic bishops are gearing up for a fight, calling the mandate "literally unconscionable" and "an unprecedented attack on freedom of conscience and of religion."
Bishop Leonard Blair of Toledo, in a letter to be read at all 131 parishes in the 19-county diocese, called the ruling "an alarming and serious matter ... that strikes at the fundamental right to religious liberty for all citizens of any faith."
The letter says the debate is not about Catholic doctrine or the morality of contraception, but religious liberty and freedom of conscience for all citizens.
"We cannot -- we will not -- comply with this unjust law," Bishop Blair said in his letter. The bishop declined requests from The (Toledo) Blade to be interviewed for this story.
The Health and Human Services mandate was issued as an "interim final rule" in August, 2011, and takes effect for most employers on Aug. 1. The department gave a one-year extension, to Aug. 1, 2013, for nonprofit employers who for religious reasons do not currently provide contraceptive coverage.
"In effect, the President is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences," Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said in a statement.
'Appropriate balance'
Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of health and human services, said the decisions were made "after very careful consideration, including the important concerns some have raised about religious liberty. I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services."
She said the department "will continue to work closely with religious groups during this transitional period to discuss their concerns."
Concerns among religious groups are many, touching on a complex array of constitutional, moral, ethical, and cultural grounds.
Some say that if the federal government can order religious groups to go against their own teachings, what will be the next step and where will it end?
"To force a religious institution to perform those services strikes me as an egregious violation of conscience," said Peter Feldmeier, professor of Catholic studies at the University of Toledo. "I think the government is overstepping its bounds in a big way."
A 2005 Harris Poll found that 93 percent of all adults, including 90 percent of Catholics, support birth control and contraception.
Last week, Pope Benedict XVI told visiting U.S. bishops that core values of American culture are being threatened by "radical secularism." In an apparent reference to the Health and Human Services' ruling, the Pope said many bishops had told him of "concerted efforts" against "the right of conscientious objection ... to cooperation in intrinsically evil practices."
Drop health care?
Among the difficult options Catholic institutions are now considering are eliminating all health-care coverage to employees, refusing to obey the federal rules and facing the penalties, or cutting their direct ties to the church, as did the 60,000-employee Catholic Healthcare West. That San Francisco-based group, which changed its name to Dignity Health, has been adding non-Catholic medical centers and says on its Web site that it is "rooted in the Catholic tradition, but is not an official ministry of the Roman Catholic Church."
Penalties for noncompliance with the new federal rules can be substantial.
In his letter read at churches this weekend, Bishop Blair is urging Catholics to contact Congress to support legislation that would reverse the HHS decision.
__
By DAVID YONKE AND JULIE McKINNON - The Blade, Toledo (MCT)
(c)2012 The Blade (Toledo, Ohio)
Visit The Blade (Toledo, Ohio) at www.toledoblade.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services

46°
Comments
Share your thoughts and opinions with your community. All comments on our site are governed by our Discussion Guidelines. You must have a valid account to post comments.
08:21 AM
6079 Smith W says
"There are 77.7 million Catholics in the United States. In 2008 they made up 27% of the electorate, about 35 million people. Mr. Obama carried the Catholic vote, 54% to 45%. They helped him win.
They won't this year. And guess where a lot of Catholics live? In the battleground states."
"There was nothing for the president to gain, except, perhaps, the pleasure of making a great church bow to him."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020388990457719952357737398...
06:25 AM
Snoozer says
Your vote doesn"t count! The electorial college decides who the president is!10:55 AM
6079 Smith W says
@ Snoozer: And the "swing states" ultimately decide.If VP Gore would have only won his home state of TN, FL's outcome wouldn't have mattered.
11:02 AM
6079 Smith W says
I would surmise that the RCC believes that this is also a case of "creeping legislation." How soon before the State dictates that abortions must be performed in all hospitals and clinics regardless of religious beliefs?Here's a list of differing religions and their views on abortion:
http://www.spuc.org.uk/youth/student_info_on_abortion/religion
05:25 PM
44846GWP says
Who cares what Cathoics say, they have enough problems of their own to take care of.06:02 PM
Sam says
44824GWP, "who cares what Catholic say" ? With more than 68.5 registered million members, and the largest religious domination in the U.S, the answer, most politicians who wants to be elected or reelected..08:53 PM
Kottage Kat says
@ Sam, Could you please give me the number of the Muslim population of the U. S.? Think those numbers might surprise you. Not taking a stance on this issue, just asking. Thank you Kat07:24 AM
Marcus M says
kat, Checking various sources the population of Muslims in the U.S. estimates seem to vary between 3-6 million.09:32 AM
Kottage Kat says
Marcus M, Thank you Kat06:09 PM
6079 Smith W says
@ 44846GWP aka Zippy: "Cathoics"?Yea let's just shred free speech and religious rights. Who needs 'em in the Democratic People's Republic of Obama?
11:33 AM
Marcus M says
This is the same administration that bends over backwards not to offend ISLAM. I thinks its great, turn off the Catholic voters, anything to ensure Obbie is a one termer....09:45 AM
6079 Smith W says
Agree with the RCC (and other denominations) - this is none of the feds business.The Supremes will soon divine whether the "individual mandate" for the diktat that health insurance be purchased is constitutional. This is THE most important constitutional case in decades.
If upheld, the feds will be able to pass the most restrictive laws against individual liberty and this "shining city on the hill" is kaput!
05:25 AM
Snoozer says
Global population has swelled in record time since 1987, when it hit 5 billion. Now we are at 7 billion people. If something Isn"t done now about the world population then future generations will suffer. We might not be around to see it happen but its our responsibility as a human race to protect our future generations! After all these are our Great, great, great, great grandchildren here! Im all for birth control, this planet can only support so many people, I think the Catholic church is more concerned about Money than anything else here. After all it does say in "God" we trust on American currency doesn"t it?11:05 PM
swiss family says
I am not sure that I am understanding this completely... So what the Church is upset about is that, because they as a Church, do NOT believe that any type of contraception is alright.. which is fine for them to believe anyway they choose..but that they feel violated because the workers at their operations have to have insurance that merely provides free contraceptives???? Wouldn't the faithful followers who are given this benefit, NOT choose to get the contraceptives if that is what they believe in?? or are they trying to dictate their beliefs on everyone???I am thinking that the Catholic church is believing that they are higher in priority against the law.. they were allowed to totally mock the laws about the past sexual infractions, somehow, actually proving that they might be more powerful than our National laws, otherwise so many of them would be in prison...To me, it only shows how insecure they are about the people that they call their "faithful followers" if they think that just because it is offered to them, that most will jump ship, and get the contraceptives..???if that is how easy it is to shake their faith, than it says way too much on how insecure they are with their own foundation, and their followers..
What then would be fair to every other Religion?? I know the people of Jewish faith believe that it is wrong for them to eat Pork products and everything needs to be Kosher.. so by that same logic, should we ban all non Kosher products and all pork products from being sold?? Of course not.. the Jewish people know that it is up to their own followers and believers to make sure that they follow the rules set forth by their beliefs, and do NOT make everyone follow their rules.. Will we next make sure that No meat is sold on Fridays in Lent, to appease the Catholics again?? or do we give them and every other American to have the freedom to choose how and why to eat, and act, and believe as they see fit??I also find it sad that the Church once again puts their spin on the wrong thing.. I am sickened by the fact that they are outraged to the point of fasting and going hungry, because they are offended that they have to follow the law.. but they were not anywhere near the same outraged when it was exposed that so many of their leaders were assaulting children... I am sorry but in the grand scheme of things I think God, who is supposed to be who they are trying to emulate and worship, would care so much more about the children, than about having to provide reasonable medical benefits...
11:23 AM
truckin says
Once again you are way off in your liberal views.. Absolutely got it ALL wrong. You are just another that says stuff like "oh well, doesn't involve me" It does and one day the control will be a complete circle, (i realize you'll have to think on that one awhile) then you MIGHT wake up and realize what everyone has been singly complaining about.08:09 AM
Nootbaar3 says
Really Swiss??? Lets educate you a bit. The Catholic religion OWNS and OPERATES these facilities in question. The government doesn't. Get the point now?11:37 AM
swiss family says
so then , with all of your knowledge on this topic.... the Catholic hospitals do NOT get any federal assistance or any government discounts etc I highly doubt that... Plus if the Muslims have their own hospitals, you are saying that they can do as they please as well???? without following government guidelines?? I doubt that... the bottom line is that the Catholic Church is NOT above the law, and should have to follow all federal guidelines in accordance.... When they get special treatment, as they are expecting here, that is when disaster is possible.. as in the sex abuse scandal..12:03 PM
6079 Smith W says
@ swiss family: So if the feds ultimately decide that ALL hospitals, private, public and religious MUST perform abortions that would be OK with you because it's federal law?The Nazis had laws against Jews. They must have been OK because the govt. said so huh?
10:41 AM
Ehovemom says
But can't they ignore the regulations as long as they do not accept federal money? Isn't that why they no longer deliver babies in Catholic Hospitals (because they refuse tubal ligations after delivery, which is the only time insurance will pay for it)?11:14 AM
6079 Smith W says
@ Ehovemom: You had better read up on the issue. HHS and Mr. Obama have suspended this federal overreach for one year (after the election):http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120131/Catholic-bishops-colleges-resi...
Who says that Mr. Obama doesn't "play politics"? LOL
09:57 PM
jack langhals says
What happened to Separation of Church and State? What is left that the Federal government isn't tyring to dictate?There isn't a person in Washinton qualified to pass a law to govern We The People!Just another step closer to A DICTATORSHIP.!09:18 PM
mister wizard says
Rubber Match07:35 PM
Nootbaar3 says
The Feds have no right to try and put this type of mandate on any church. This is an attack at the principles of a religion that has been around longer than this country.