DeWine defends using driver's license photos for law enforcement

ACLU takes issue with unannounced use of state's automatically matching photos against a database of driver’s license, state-issued ID cards, arrest mugshots and other state photo records in effort to find names and contact information.
TNS Regional News
Aug 27, 2013


The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio on Monday called on Attorney General Mike DeWine to halt local and state law enforcement’s use of facial recognition software, arguing proper privacy protections and protocols have not been put into place.

Law enforcement officers have been able since June 6 to automatically match photos against a database of driver’s license, state-issued ID cards, arrest mugshots and other state photo records to find names and contact information. Officers have been able to access those photos for years, but previously had to search by name, address or other identifiable information.

Law enforcement officers using the Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway have utilized facial recognition 2,677 times between June 6 and Aug. 21. DeWine said Monday he should have announced the new facial recognition function when the system first went live in early June. He said his office did not publicly announce the new tool because more than half the states use it and it is an extension of lawful procedure.

“It was not anything that I thought was out of the ordinary — it’s a natural extension with what we’ve done with BMV records,” DeWine told reporters during a Monday morning news conference. Watch video of DeWine here.

The attorney general’s office announced the news conference Sunday, after the Cincinnati Enquirer first reported the new technology and discussions among DeWine and staff members about whether to make it public knowledge.

ACLU Associate Director Gary Daniels said press conferences and advisory boards should have been convened months ago.

“This system needs to be shut down until there are meaningful, documented rules in place to keep this information secure, protect the privacy of innocent people and prevent government abuse of this new tool,” Daniels said in a statement.

DeWine said the database and facial recognition feature can only be accessed for “lawful purposes” and no new protocols or privacy protections were added when the system went live. He has since convened a panel of judges, the public defender, chiefs of police, sheriffs and other law enforcement officers to review the use of the new technology and suggest policy changes. DeWine has set an Oct. 25 deadline for the panel’s recommendations.

Daniels said that without specific limits on the technology, use will spread to Ohioans who are not criminal suspects.

“This is not speculation,” Daniels said. “It is a foregone conclusion when government thinks of law enforcement first and its citizens’ right to privacy last.”

Cincinnati attorney David Pepper, who has announced his candidacy to run against DeWine in 2014 on the Democratic ticket, was quick to criticize DeWine for not publicly announcing the new technology and examining privacy issues.

“I see the law enforcement benefits, but I also see major risks and concerns and the bottom line is you should be transparent about what this is and what you’re going to do with it,” Pepper said.

DeWine said no new photos are added or new databases created. Facial recognition software measures and compares the distance between points and human facial features, such as between the eyes. The technology could be used to identify a bank robber caught on security camera or a lost elderly person with Alzheimer’s disease.

“I don’t hesitate for a minute to tell you I’m proud of this technology, I’m proud of what we’re doing and we’re going to save lives,” DeWine said.


By Jackie Borchardt - Dayton Daily News, Ohio (MCT)

©2013 the Dayton Daily News (Dayton, Ohio)

Visit the Dayton Daily News (Dayton, Ohio) at

Distributed by MCT Information Services



... isn't that one of the reasons they take your I'd in the first place when you get pulled over? To check for priors?


"Big Brother" is getting even larger . . . . It's like easing into a cold swimming pool. It's shocking at first, but eventually you get used to it and take another step deeper, repeating the process until you find yourself swimming in the pool.

The government reads our emails. They record every keystroke we type. They eavesdrop on our calls. Now this. As Thomas Jefferson said, "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have."

Oops! Now the NSA will be after me . . . . after all, it is only a matter of time before they are allowed to take away the First Amendment to the Constitution, too.


You just keep saying that. you think you are saying something but that is a cover shield from the real issue our law enforcement is seeking..The ACLU is not defending you??? Who does this protect?? It comes down to an end of Jose saying he is Hector, while using Juan's drivers license, because if known as Paco instead of Miguel he would have been arrested.. The END.
A non-American illegal has more rights and free legal protection than that of a LEGAL American. FACT


And maybe next we can spy on our neighbors, family and friends...turn 'em in as an enemy of the country. Nazi laws, special salutes,etc. Yep, it is coming...